Advertisement
Research Paper| Volume 14, ISSUE 2, 101422, March 2023

Association of health literacy with short-term postoperative outcomes in older adult patients with abdominal tumors undergoing surgery and perioperative rehabilitation program: A prospective cohort study

Published:January 17, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2022.101422

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Low health literacy (HL) is associated with poor surgical outcomes in patients with abdominal tumors, despite enhanced recovery programs. However, the relationship between HL and postoperative outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical functions, has been unclear in patients with abdominal tumors receiving perioperative rehabilitation programs (PRPs).
      Our objective was to identify associations of HL with postoperative functional and general outcomes in patients with abdominal tumors undergoing surgery and PRPs, controlling for critical covariates.

      Materials and Methods

      The prospective cohort study was conducted from April 2020 to December 2021 in a single acute care hospital in Akita City, Japan. Out of 112 consecutive older adults with abdominal tumors referred to PRPs before surgery for tumors, 101 participated. Three patients declined undergoing follow-up assessment, and thus 97 were analyzed. Demographic data, comorbidities, education, surgical procedure, frailty status, cognitive functions, physical activity, nutritional status, tumor sites, types, and stages were collected as covariates at baseline. All participants underwent PRPs. HL was measured using the Japanese version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, a comprehensive HL measurement. Primary endpoints were changes in HRQOL, measured using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index and EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and physical functions (chair-stand ability, usual gait speed, and grip strength) from before surgery to discharge. Secondary endpoints were 90-day readmissions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Multivariate regression with inverse probability weighting, using propensity scores, estimeted associations of HL with the outcomes.

      Results

      Of the 97 patients (36 [37.1%] women, mean [standard deviation] age 74.4 [6.3] years), 42 (43.3%) reported low HL. At baseline, patients with low HL exhibited worse EQ-5D-5L scores (P = .001), EQ-VAS values (P = .03), chair-stand ability (P = .001), and gait speed (P = .03) than controls. Low HL was associated with a low risk of grip strength declines (risk ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.99) but not with any other outcome.

      Discussion

      There appeared to be no apparent associations of HL with surgical outcomes in patients with abdominal tumors receiving PRPs. Thus, HL might not be a crucial predictor of surgical outcomes when combined with PRPs.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Institute of Medicine
        (US) Committee on Health Literacy. In: Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, eds.
      1. The health literacy of America's adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy.
        • Berkman N.D.
        • Sheridan S.L.
        • Donahue K.E.
        • Halpern D.J.
        • Crotty K.
        Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 97-107https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
        • Nakayama K.
        • Osaka W.
        • Togari T.
        • Ishikawa H.
        • Yonekura Y.
        • Sekido A.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive health literacy in Japan is lower than in Europe: a validated Japanese-language assessment of health literacy.
        BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 505https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x
        • Garcia-Codina O.
        • Juvinyà-Canal D.
        • Amil-Bujan P.
        • Bertran-Noguer C.
        • González-Mestre M.A.
        • Masachs-Fatjo E.
        • et al.
        Determinants of health literacy in the general population: results of the Catalan health survey.
        BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1122https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7381-1
        • Serper M.
        • Patzer R.E.
        • Curtis L.M.
        • Smith S.G.
        • O’Conor R.
        • Baker D.W.
        • et al.
        Health literacy, cognitive ability, and functional health status among older adults.
        Health Serv Res. 2014; 49: 1249-1267https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12154
        • Wright J.P.
        • Edwards G.C.
        • Goggins K.
        • Tiwari V.
        • Maiga A.
        • Moses K.
        • et al.
        Association of health literacy with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 137-142https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3832
        • Theiss L.M.
        • Wood T.
        • McLeod M.C.
        • Shao C.
        • Santos Marques I.D.
        • Bajpai S.
        • et al.
        The association of health literacy and postoperative complications after colorectal surgery: a cohort study.
        Am J Surg. October 2021; (2021;S0002–9610(21):00617–00616)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.10.024
        • Rothermel L.D.
        • Conley C.C.
        • Sarode A.L.
        • Young M.F.
        • Uscanga Z.L.
        • McIntyre M.
        • et al.
        Health literacy in surgical oncology patients: an observational study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19: 1407-1414https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.7029
        • Stout N.L.
        • Santa Mina D.
        • Lyons K.D.
        • Robb K.
        • Silver J.K.
        A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 149-175https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21639
        • Levasseur M.
        • Carrier A.
        Do rehabilitation professionals need to consider their clients’ health literacy for effective practice?.
        Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24: 756-765https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509360752
        • Jensen M.B.
        • Houborg K.B.
        • Nørager C.B.
        • Henriksen M.G.
        • Laurberg S.
        Postoperative changes in fatigue, physical function and body composition: an analysis of the amalgamated data from five randomized trials on patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
        Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13: 588-593https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02232.x
        • Carli F.
        • Charlebois P.
        • Stein B.
        • Feldman L.
        • Zavorsky G.
        • Kim D.J.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 1187-1197https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7102
        • Osoba D.
        Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials.
        Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2011; 3: 57-71https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834010395342
        • Ezzatvar Y.
        • Ramírez-Vélez R.
        • Sáez de Asteasu M.L.
        • Martínez-Velilla N.
        • Zambom-Ferraresi F.
        • Izquierdo M.
        • et al.
        Physical function and all-cause mortality in older adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021; 76: 1447-1453https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa305
        • Chew L.D.
        • Griffin J.M.
        • Partin M.R.
        • Noorbaloochi S.
        • Grill J.P.
        • Snyder A.
        • et al.
        Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23: 561-566https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5
        • Haun J.
        • Luther S.
        • Dodd V.
        • Donaldson P.
        Measurement variation across health literacy assessments: implications for assessment selection in research and practice.
        J Health Commun. 2012; 17: 141-159https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.712615
        • Sørensen K.
        • Van den Broucke S.
        • Pelikan J.M.
        • Fullam J.
        • Doyle G.
        • Slonska Z.
        • et al.
        Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q).
        BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 948https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-948
        • Shunya I.
        • Takeru S.
        • Ataru I.
        • Shinichi N.
        • Takashi F.
        • Shinya S.
        • et al.
        Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set.
        J Natl Inst Public Health. 2015; 64: 47-55
        • Herdman M.
        • Gudex C.
        • Lloyd A.
        • Janssen M.
        • Kind P.
        • Parkin D.
        • et al.
        Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).
        Qual Life Res. 2011; 20: 1727-1736https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
        • Janssen M.F.
        • Pickard A.S.
        • Golicki D.
        • Gudex C.
        • Niewada M.
        • Scalone L.
        • et al.
        Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study.
        Qual Life Res. 2013; 22: 1717-1727https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4
        • Jones C.J.
        • Rikli R.E.
        • Beam W.C.
        A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults.
        Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999; 70: 113-119https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028
        • Chen L.K.
        • Woo J.
        • Assantachai P.
        • Auyeung T.W.
        • Chou M.Y.
        • Iijima K.
        • et al.
        Asian working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21: 300-307.e2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012
        • Pickard A.S.
        • Neary M.P.
        • Cella D.
        Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 70https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-70
        • Copay A.G.
        • Subach B.R.
        • Glassman S.D.
        • Polly D.W.
        • Schuler T.C.
        Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.
        Spine J. 2007; 7: 541-546https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
        • Dindo D.
        • Demartines N.
        • Clavien P.A.
        Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205-213https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
        • Clavien P.A.
        • Barkun J.
        • de Oliveira M.L.
        • Vauthey J.N.
        • Dindo D.
        • Schulick R.D.
        • et al.
        The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 187-196https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
        • Slankamenac K.
        • Graf R.
        • Barkun J.
        • Puhan M.A.
        • Clavien P.A.
        The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity.
        Ann Surg. 2013; 258: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732
        • Quan H.
        • Li B.
        • Couris C.M.
        • Fushimi K.
        • Graham P.
        • Hider P.
        • et al.
        Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173: 676-682https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq433
        • Satake S.
        • Arai H.
        The revised Japanese version of the cardiovascular health study criteria (revised J-CHS criteria).
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020; 20: 992-993https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14005
        • Lawton M.P.
        • Brody E.M.
        Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily Living1.
        Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179-186https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
        • Borson S.
        • Scanlan J.M.
        • Chen P.
        • Ganguli M.
        The Mini-cog as a screen for dementia: validation in a population-based sample.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51: 1451-1454https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51465.x
        • Murase N.
        • Katsumura T.
        • Ueda C.
        Validity and reliability of Japanese version of international physical activity questionnaire.
        J Health Welf Stat. 2002; 49: 1-9
        • Tomioka K.
        • Iwamoto J.
        • Saeki K.
        • Okamoto N.
        Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) in elderly adults: the Fujiwara-kyo study.
        J Epidemiol. 2011; 21: 459-465https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20110003
        • Bouillanne O.
        • Morineau G.
        • Dupont C.
        • Coulombel I.
        • Vincent J.P.
        • Nicolis I.
        • et al.
        Geriatric nutritional risk index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82: 777-783https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.4.777
        • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management
        Practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on perioperative blood management*.
        Anesthesiology. 2015; 122: 241-275https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000463
        • Shiba K.
        • Kawahara T.
        Using propensity scores for causal inference: pitfalls and tips.
        J Epidemiol. 2021; 31: 457-463https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20210145
        • Park D.J.
        • Lee H.J.
        • Kim H.H.
        • Yang H.K.
        • Lee K.U.
        • Choe K.J.
        Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 1099-1102https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4952
        • Garth A.K.
        • Newsome C.M.
        • Simmance N.
        • Crowe T.C.
        Nutritional status, nutrition practices and post-operative complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010; 23: 393-401https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01058.x
        • Lin H.S.
        • Watts J.N.
        • Peel N.M.
        • Hubbard R.E.
        Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review.
        BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16: 157https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0329-8
        • Fagard K.
        • Leonard S.
        • Deschodt M.
        • Devriendt E.
        • Wolthuis A.
        • Prenen H.
        • et al.
        The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
        J Geriatr Oncol. 2016; 7: 479-491https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2016.06.001
        • Ahonen-Siirtola M.
        • Rautio T.
        • Ward J.
        • Kössi J.
        • Ohtonen P.
        • Mäkelä J.
        Complications in laparoscopic versus open incisional ventral hernia repair. A retrospective comparative study.
        World J Surg. 2015; 39: 2872-2877https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3210-6
        • McGowan L.
        • Kross S.
        • Leek J.
        Tools for analyzing R code the tidy way.
        R I Dent J. 2020; 12: 226https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2020-011
        • Yoshida K.
        • Bartel A.
        • Chipman J.J.
        • Bohn J.
        • McGowan L.D.
        • Barrett M.
        • et al.
        Tableone: create ‘Table 1’ to describe baseline characteristics with or without propensity score weights.
        2021 (Accessed March 29, 2022)
      2. Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. 5.

        • Zeileis A.
        • Köll S.
        • Graham N.
        Various versatile variances: an object-oriented implementation of clustered covariances in R.
        J Stat Softw. 2020; 95https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v095.i01
        • Lumley T.
        Survey analysis of complex survey samples.
        (Accessed October 23, 2021)
        • Zou G.
        A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159: 702-706https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh090
        • Kristman V.
        • Manno M.
        • Côté P.
        Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much?.
        Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19: 751-760https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ejep.0000036568.02655.f8
        • Xu S.
        • Ross C.
        • Raebel M.A.
        • Shetterly S.
        • Blanchette C.
        • Smith D.
        Use of stabilized inverse propensity scores as weights to directly estimate relative risk and its confidence intervals.
        Value Health. 2010; 13: 273-277https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00671.x
        • Austin P.C.
        • Stuart E.A.
        Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
        Stat Med. 2015; 34: 3661-3679https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607
        • Coker R.H.
        • Hays N.P.
        • Williams R.H.
        • Wolfe R.R.
        • Evans W.J.
        Bed rest promotes reductions in walking speed, functional parameters, and aerobic fitness in older, healthy adults.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70: 91-96https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu123
        • Hartley P.
        • Romero-Ortuno R.
        • Wellwood I.
        • Deaton C.
        Changes in muscle strength and physical function in older patients during and after hospitalisation: a prospective repeated-measures cohort study.
        Age Ageing. 2021; 50: 153-160https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa103
        • Pedersen M.M.
        • Petersen J.
        • Bean J.F.
        • Damkjaer L.
        • Juul-Larsen H.G.
        • Andersen O.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of progressive sit-to-stand training among older hospitalized patients.
        PeerJ. 2015; 3e1500https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1500
        • Parry S.M.
        • Puthucheary Z.A.
        The impact of extended bed rest on the musculoskeletal system in the critical care environment.
        Extrem Physiol Med. 2015; 4: 16https://doi.org/10.1186/s13728-015-0036-7
        • Winkelman C.
        Bed rest in health and critical illness: a body systems approach.
        AACN Adv Crit Care. 2009; 20: 254-266https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181ac838d
        • Ostir G.V.
        • Berges I.M.
        • Kuo Y.F.
        • Goodwin J.S.
        • Fisher S.R.
        • Guralnik J.M.
        Mobility activity and its value as a prognostic indicator of survival in hospitalized older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61: 551-557https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12170
        • Lawrence V.A.
        • Hazuda H.P.
        • Cornell J.E.
        • Pederson T.
        • Bradshaw P.T.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • et al.
        Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199: 762-772https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.280
        • Gillis C.
        • Li C.
        • Lee L.
        • Awasthi R.
        • Augustin B.
        • Gamsa A.
        • et al.
        Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for Cancer.
        Anesthesiology. 2014; 121: 937-947https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393
        • Watanabe T.
        • Momosaki R.
        • Suzuki S.
        • Abo M.
        Preoperative rehabilitation for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
        Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28: 2293-2297https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05061-z