Advertisement

A meta-analysis on the role older adults with cancer favour in treatment decision making

Published:October 12, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.012

      Abstract

      Introduction

      In the complex setting of oncological treatment decision making, balancing professional guidance while respecting patient involvement can be a challenge. We set out to assess the role adults with cancer favour in treatment decision making (TDM), including differences across age groups and change over time.

      Materials and methods

      A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase, for studies on role preference of (older) adults with cancer in oncological treatment decision making. A meta-analysis was conducted based on Control Preference Scale (CPS) data, a questionnaire on patient role preference in TDM.

      Results

      This meta-analysis includes 33 studies reporting CPS data comprising 17,197 adults with cancer. Mean age was 60.6 years old for studies that specified age (24 studies, 6155 patients). During the last decade, patients' role preference shifted towards significantly more active involvement in TDM (p = 0.006). No age-dependent subgroup differences have been identified; both younger and older adults, defined as, respectively, below and above 65 years old, favour active involvement in treatment decision making.

      Discussion

      Over time, adults with cancer have shifted towards more active role preference in treatment decision making. In current cancer care, a large majority prefers taking an active role, irrespective of age.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Reyna V.F.
        • Nelson W.L.
        • Han P.K.
        • Pignone M.P.
        Decision making and cancer.
        Am Psychol. 2015; 70: 105-118
        • National Cancer Institute
        Age and Cancer Risk.
        National Cancer Institute, 2021
        • Sedrak M.S.
        • et al.
        Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: a systematic review of barriers and interventions.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 78-92
        • Biganzoli L.
        • et al.
        Management of elderly patients with breast cancer: updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).
        Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13 (e148–e160)
        • Geessink N.H.
        • et al.
        Shared Decision-Making in Older Patients with Colorectal or Pancreatic Cancer: Determinants of Patients’ and Observers’ Perceptions.
        2018https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005
        • Gärtner F.R.
        • et al.
        Role of patient preferences in clinical practice guidelines: a multiple methods study using guidelines from oncology as a case.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e032483
        • Singh J.A.
        • et al.
        Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the control preferences scale.
        Am J Manag Care. 2011; 16: 688-696
        • GERONTE
        • Rahman M.
        • et al.
        Asia Pacific observatory on health systems and policies.
        Jpn Health Syst Rev Health Syst Transit. 2018; 8
        • Nakayama K.
        • et al.
        Shared decision making, physicians’ explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20
        • Degner L.
        • Sloan J.
        • Venkatesh P.
        The control preferences scale - pubMed.
        Can J Nurs Res. 1997; 29: 21-43
        • Wells G.
        • et al.
        The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses.
        • van Stam M.A.
        • et al.
        Shared decision making in prostate Cancer care—encouraging every patient to be actively involved in decision making or ensuring the patient preferred level of involvement?.
        J Urol. 2018; 200: 582-589
        • Drummond F.J.
        • Gavin A.T.
        • Sharp L.
        Incongruence in treatment decision making is associated with lower health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: results from the PiCTure study.
        Support Care Cancer. 2018; 26: 1645-1654
        • Wallace B.C.
        • et al.
        Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end.
        J Stat Softw. 2012; 49: 1-15
        • Puts M.T.E.
        • et al.
        Chemotherapy treatment decision-making experiences of older adults with cancer, their family members, oncologists and family physicians: a mixed methods study.
        Support Care Cancer. 2017; 25: 879-886
        • Lawhon V.M.
        • et al.
        “It’s important to me”: a qualitative analysis on shared decision-making and patient preferences in older adults with early-stage breast cancer.
        Psychooncology. 2020; 30: 167-175
        • Cuypers M.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer survivors with a passive role preference in treatment decision-making are less satisfied with information received: results from the PROFILES registry.
        Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2016; 34
        • Drummond F.J.
        • Gavin A.T.
        • Sharp L.
        Incongruence in treatment decision making is associated with lower health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: results from the PiCTure study.
        Support Care Cancer. 2017; 26: 1645-1654
        • Hamelinck V.C.
        • et al.
        Preferred and perceived participation of younger and older patients in decision making about treatment for early breast cancer: a prospective study.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2018; 18 (e245–e253)
        • Hotta K.
        • et al.
        Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: lung cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions: results from Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0705.
        JTO Acquis. 2010; 5: 1668-1672
        • Ellis C.T.
        • Charlton M.E.
        • Stitzenberg K.B.
        Patient-reported roles, preferences, and expectations regarding treatment of stage I rectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium (CanCORS).
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000662
        • Mack J.W.
        • Cronin A.
        • Fasciano K.
        • Block S.D.
        • Keating N.L.
        Cancer treatment decision-making among young adults with lung and colorectal cancer: a comparison with adults in middle age.
        Psychooncology. 2016; 25: 1085-1091
        • Schaede U.
        • et al.
        Shared decision-making in patients with prostate cancer in Japan: patient preferences versus physician perceptions.
        J Glob Oncol. 2017; 2018: 1-9
        • Lin C.
        • Cohen E.
        • Livingston P.M.
        • Botti Mari
        Perceptions of Patient Participation in Symptom Management: A Qualitative Study with Cancer Patients, Doctors, and Nurses.
        2018https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13853
        • Zhai H.
        • et al.
        Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.
        Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28: 5353-5361
        • Almyroudi A.
        • Degner L.
        • Paika V.
        • Pavlidis N.
        • Hyphantis T.
        Decision-making preferences and information needs among Greek breast cancer patients.
        Psychooncology. 2010; 20: 871-879
        • Ernst J.
        • et al.
        Desired and perceived participation in medical decision-making in patients with haemato-oncological diseases.
        Leuk Res. 2010; 34: 390-392
        • Ernst J.
        • et al.
        Patient participation in the medical decision-making process in haemato-oncology - a qualitative study.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013; 22: 684-690
        • Mahmoodi N.
        • Sargeant S.
        Shared decision-making – rhetoric and reality: women’s experiences and perceptions of adjuvant treatment decision-making for breast cancer.
        J Health Psychol. 2019; 24: 1082-1092
        • Kehl K.
        • et al.
        Association of actual and preferred decision roles with patient-reported quality of care: shared decision making in cancer care.
        JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1: 50-58
        • Shay L.
        • Lafata J.
        Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.
        Med Decis Making. 2015; 35: 114-131
        • Berger A.M.
        • et al.
        Preferences and actual chemotherapy decision-making in the greater plains collaborative breast cancer study.
        Acta Oncol (Madr). 2017; 56: 1690-1697
        • Makimoto G.
        • et al.
        Patients’ preferences and perceptions of lung cancer treatment decision making: results from Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1406.
        Acta Oncol. 2020; 59: 324-328
        • Geessink N.H.
        • Schoon Y.
        • van Herk H.C.P.
        • van Goor H.
        • Olde Rikkert M.G.M.
        Key elements of optimal treatment decision-making for surgeons and older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 100: 473-479
        • Mohile S.G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study.
        Lancet. 2021; 398: 1894-1904
        • Atherton P.J.
        • et al.
        The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life.
        Cancer. 2013; 119: 2342-2349
        • Bieber C.
        • et al.
        How does a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for oncologists affect participation style and preference matching in patients with breast and colon cancer?.
        J Cancer Educ. 2018; 33: 708-715
        • Brown R.
        • et al.
        Meeting the Decision-Making Preferences of Patients With Breast Cancer in Oncology Consultations: Impact on Decision-Related Outcomes.
        30. 2012: 857-862https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7952
        • Chawla N.
        • Arora N.K.
        Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?.
        J Cancer Surviv. 2013; 74: 592-601
        • Cohen E.
        • Botti M.
        Cancer patients’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to patient participation in symptom management during an episode of admission.
        Cancer Nurs. 2015; 38: 458-465
        • Colley A.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with oncology patients’ involvement in shared decision making during chemotherapy.
        Psychooncology. 2017; 26: 1972-1979
        • Colombet I.
        • Rigal L.
        • Urtizberea M.
        • Vinant P.
        • Rouquette A.
        Validity of the French version of the autonomy preference index and its adaptation for patients with advanced cancer.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15
        • Ernst J.
        • et al.
        Desired and perceived participation in medical decision-making in patients with haemato-oncological diseases.
        Leuk Res. 2010; 34: 390-392
        • Gutnik L.
        • Allen C.M.C.
        • Presson A.P.
        • Matsen C.B.
        Breast cancer surgery decision role perceptions and choice of surgery.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27: 3623-3632
        • Herrmann A.
        • et al.
        Not asking cancer patients about their preferences does make a difference. A cross-sectional study examining cancer patients’ preferred and perceived role in decision-making regarding their last important cancer treatment.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018; 27e12871
        • Huang J.
        • Chagpar A.
        Association for Academic Surgery Active Participation in Decision-Making in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Patients With Breast Cancer.
        2019https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.037
        • Jabbour J.
        • et al.
        The Relationship Between Role Preferences in Decision-Making and Level of Psychological Distress in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.
        2018https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.023
        • Kunneman
        • et al.
        Treatment preferences and involvement in treatment decision making of patients with endometrial cancer and clinicians.
        Br J Cancer. 2014; 1114: 674-679
        • Mackenzie L.
        • et al.
        Perceived Problems with Involvement in Decision Making about Breast Cancer Treatment and Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.
        2021https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.044
        • Moth E.
        • et al.
        Patients’ preferred and perceived roles in making decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
        Lung Cancer. 2016; 95: 8-14
        • Pardon K.
        • et al.
        Preferences of advanced lung cancer patients for patient-centred information and decision-making: a prospective multicentre study in 13 hospitals in Belgium.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 77: 421-429
        • Pieterse A.H.
        • Baas-Thijssen M.
        • Marijnen C.
        • Stiggelbout A.M.
        Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.
        Br J Cancer. 2008; 99: 875-882
        • Stacey D.
        • Paquet L.
        • Samant R.
        Exploring cancer treatment decision-making by patients: a descriptive study.
        Curr Oncol. 2010; 17: 85
        • Yennurajalingam S.
        • et al.
        Decisional control preferences of Hispanic patients with advanced cancer from the United States and Latin America.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013; 46: 376-385