Perspectives| Volume 13, ISSUE 8, P1287-1290, November 2022

Download started.


Perspectives on implementing an ambulatory age-friendly health system pilot project

      The engagement of patients in treatment decision processes should become a fundamental element in the cancer journey [
      • Rocque G.
      • Miller-Sonnet E.
      • Balch A.
      • et al.
      Engaging multidisciplinary stakeholders to drive shared decision-making in oncology.
      ]. Organizational level change can begin within pilot clinics that review processes, develop a systematic method for improvement, and identify and include key stakeholders and patients in the process change.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Rocque G.
        • Miller-Sonnet E.
        • Balch A.
        • et al.
        Engaging multidisciplinary stakeholders to drive shared decision-making in oncology.
        J Palliat Care. 2019; 34: 29-31
        • Van Haitsma K.
        • Abbott K.M.
        • Arbogast A.
        • et al.
        A preference-based model of care: an integrative theoretical model of the role of preferences in person-centered care.
        Gerontologist. 2019; 60: 376-384
        • Plsek P.
        Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academies Pr, Washington, DC2001
        • Person-Centered Care
        A definition and essential elements.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64: 15-18
        • Wolff J.L.
        • Boyd C.M.
        A look at person- and family-centered Care among older adults: results from a National Survey [corrected].
        J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30: 1497-1504
        • Flagg A.J.
        The role of patient-centered Care in Nursing.
        Nursing Clinics of North America. 2015; 50: 75-86
        • Wolf D.M.
        • Lehman L.
        • Quinlin R.
        • Zullo T.
        • Hoffman L.
        Effect of patient-centered Care on patient satisfaction and quality of Care.
        J Nurs Care Qual. 2008; 23
        • Berkowitz B.
        The patient experience and patient satisfaction: measurement of a complex dynamic.
        Online J Issues Nurs. 2016; 21: 1
        • Moye J.
        • Driver J.A.
        • Owsiany M.T.
        • et al.
        Assessing what matters Most in older adults with multi-complexity.
        Gerontologist. 2021; 62: e224-e234
        • United Nations
        World population ageing 2017 highlights.
        (Accessed October 13, 2021)
        • American Cancer Society
        Cancer facts & figures 2019.
        American Cancer Society, Atlanta2019
        • Improvement IoH
        The 4Ms age-friendly framework.
        (Available at:)
        • Mate K.S.
        • Berman A.
        • Laderman M.
        • Kabcenell A.
        • Fulmer T.
        Creating age-friendly health systems - a vision for better care of older adults.
        Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2018; 6: 4-6
        • Donabedian A.
        Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.
        Milbank Q. 2005; 83: 691-729
        • Ogrinc G.
        • Davies L.
        • Goodman D.
        • Batalden P.
        • Davidoff F.
        • Stevens D.
        SQUIRE 2.0 (<em>Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)</em>: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.
        BMJ Quality Safety. 2016; 25: 986-992
        • Boltz M.
        • Capezuti E.
        • Shuluk J.
        • et al.
        Implementation of geriatric acute care best practices: initial results of the NICHE SITE self-evaluation.
        Nurs Health Sci. 2013; 15: 518-524
        • Pfaff J.
        The geriatric resource nurse model: a culture change.
        Geriatr Nurs. 2002; 23: 140-144
        • IHI
        Primer on Defining the Triple Aim.
        Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2007
        • Demming W.
        Out of the Crisis, Reissue.
        MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachuetts2018
        • Ganey Press
        Patient experience.
        (Accessed October 12, 2021)
        • Tyser A.R.
        • Abtahi A.M.
        • McFadden M.
        • Presson A.P.
        Evidence of non-response bias in the press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 350
        • Richardson D.R.
        • Loh K.P.
        Improving personalized treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: the necessity of eliciting patient preferences.
        Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2022; 13: 1-3
        • Handforth C.
        • Hall P.
        • Marshall H.
        • Seymour M.
        Overall treatment utility: a novel outcome measure to convey the balance of benefits and harms from cancer treatment.
        Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2013; 4: S49
        • Kouzes J.P.
        • B.
        The leadership challenge.
        S.L. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ2017
        • Tinetti M.
        • Dindo L.
        • Smith C.D.
        • et al.
        Challenges and strategies in patients’ health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.
        PloS one. 2019; 14e0218249
        • Sanders J.J.
        • Curtis J.R.
        • Tulsky J.A.
        Achieving goal-concordant Care: a conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact.
        J Palliat Med. 2018; 21: S17-s27
        • Tyser A.
        • Abtahi A.
        • McFadden M.
        • Presson A.
        Evidence of non-response bias in the press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 1-6
        • Choice of Rating Scale Labels
        Implication for minimizing patient satisfaction response ceiling effect in telemedicine surveys.
        Telemedicine and e-Health. 2014; 20: 1150-1155
        • Salman A.A.
        • Kopp B.J.
        • Thomas J.E.
        • Ring D.
        • Fatehi A.
        What are the priming and ceiling effects of one experience measure on another?.
        J Patient Exp. 2020; 7: 1755-1759
        • Chyung S.Y.
        • Hutchinson D.
        • Shamsy J.A.
        Evidence-based survey design: ceiling effects associated with response scales.
        Perform Improve. 2020; 59: 6-13