The engagement of patients in treatment decision processes should become a fundamental element in the cancer journey [
]. Organizational level change can begin within pilot clinics that review processes, develop a systematic method for improvement, and identify and include key stakeholders and patients in the process change.
- Rocque G.
- Miller-Sonnet E.
- Balch A.
- et al.
Engaging multidisciplinary stakeholders to drive shared decision-making in oncology.
J Palliat Care. 2019; 34: 29-31
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Geriatric Oncology
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Engaging multidisciplinary stakeholders to drive shared decision-making in oncology.J Palliat Care. 2019; 34: 29-31
- A preference-based model of care: an integrative theoretical model of the role of preferences in person-centered care.Gerontologist. 2019; 60: 376-384
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.National Academies Pr, Washington, DC2001
- A definition and essential elements.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64: 15-18
- A look at person- and family-centered Care among older adults: results from a National Survey [corrected].J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30: 1497-1504
- The role of patient-centered Care in Nursing.Nursing Clinics of North America. 2015; 50: 75-86
- Effect of patient-centered Care on patient satisfaction and quality of Care.J Nurs Care Qual. 2008; 23
- The patient experience and patient satisfaction: measurement of a complex dynamic.Online J Issues Nurs. 2016; 21: 1
- Assessing what matters Most in older adults with multi-complexity.Gerontologist. 2021; 62: e224-e234
- World population ageing 2017 highlights.https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdf(Accessed October 13, 2021)Date: 2017
- Cancer facts & figures 2019.American Cancer Society, Atlanta2019
- The 4Ms age-friendly framework.(Available at:)
- Creating age-friendly health systems - a vision for better care of older adults.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2018; 6: 4-6
- Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.Milbank Q. 2005; 83: 691-729
- SQUIRE 2.0 (<em>Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)</em>: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.BMJ Quality Safety. 2016; 25: 986-992
- Implementation of geriatric acute care best practices: initial results of the NICHE SITE self-evaluation.Nurs Health Sci. 2013; 15: 518-524
- The geriatric resource nurse model: a culture change.Geriatr Nurs. 2002; 23: 140-144
- Primer on Defining the Triple Aim.Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2007
- Out of the Crisis, Reissue.MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachuetts2018
- Patient experience.(Accessed October 12, 2021)
- Evidence of non-response bias in the press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 350
- Improving personalized treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: the necessity of eliciting patient preferences.Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2022; 13: 1-3
- Overall treatment utility: a novel outcome measure to convey the balance of benefits and harms from cancer treatment.Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2013; 4: S49
- The leadership challenge.S.L. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ2017
- Challenges and strategies in patients’ health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.PloS one. 2019; 14e0218249
- Achieving goal-concordant Care: a conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact.J Palliat Med. 2018; 21: S17-s27
- Evidence of non-response bias in the press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 1-6
- Implication for minimizing patient satisfaction response ceiling effect in telemedicine surveys.Telemedicine and e-Health. 2014; 20: 1150-1155
- What are the priming and ceiling effects of one experience measure on another?.J Patient Exp. 2020; 7: 1755-1759
- Evidence-based survey design: ceiling effects associated with response scales.Perform Improve. 2020; 59: 6-13
Published online: July 05, 2022
Accepted: June 28, 2022
Received in revised form: June 13, 2022
Received: January 12, 2022
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.