Advertisement
Perspectives| Volume 3, ISSUE 3, P291-293, July 2012

A call for observational cohort studies in geriatric oncology

      Abstract

      In November of 2011, an international group of leaders met to discuss how to improve evidence in geriatric oncology at the meeting of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) held in Paris, France. A recommendation from the conference participants was to develop and implement observational cohort studies to increase evidence on the efficacy and safety of cancer treatment in older adults. An observational cohort study is a study that prospectively follows a group of individuals who have specific features in common over a defined period of time. Rigorous observational cohort studies can complement randomized controlled trial (RCT) data with information on efficacy, safety, and patient compliance with cancer treatment in a population of “real-world” patients. Well-designed observational cohort studies could be extremely valuable for gathering evidence on the efficacy and safety of cancer treatments, including those that are already available, in older adults in a more cost-effective and timely way than RCTs. Funding mechanisms through the National Institutes on Health, foundations, and European funding agencies devoted specifically to developing high impact observational cohort studies in geriatric oncology would help to provide evidence for a significant proportion of older patients over a short period of time.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hurria A.
        • Mohile S.G.
        • Dale W.
        Research priorities in geriatric oncology: addressing the needs of an aging population.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. Feb 2012; 10: 286-288
        • Silverman S.L.
        From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.
        Am J Med. Feb 2009; 122: 114-120
        • Thadhani R.
        • Tonelli M.
        Cohort studies: marching forward.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. Sep 2006; 1: 1117-1123
        • Crome P.
        • Flanagan R.J.
        Pharmacokinetic studies in elderly people. Are they necessary?.
        Clin Pharmacokinet. Apr 1994; 26: 243-247
        • Hurria A.
        • Togawa K.
        • Mohile S.G.
        • Owusu C.
        • Klepin H.D.
        • Gross C.
        • et al.
        Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 3457-3465
        • Pallis A.G.
        • Ring A.
        • Fortpied C.
        • Penninckx B.
        • Van Nes MC.
        • Wedding U.
        • et al.
        EORTC workshop on clinical trial methodology in older individuals with a diagnosis of solid tumors.
        Ann Oncol. Aug 2011; 22: 1922-1926
        • Kozloff M.
        • Yood M.U.
        • Berlin J.
        • Flynn P.J.
        • Kabbanavir F.F.
        • Purdie D.M.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes associated with bevacizumab-containing treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the BRiTE observational cohort study.
        Oncologist. Sep 2009; 14: 862-870
        • Guralnik J.M.
        • Kritchevsky S.B.
        Translating research to promote healthy aging: the complementary role of longitudinal studies and clinical trials.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. Oct 2010; 58: S337-S342
        • Muss H.B.
        • Berry D.A.
        • Cirrincione C.T.
        • et al.
        Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 2055-2065