Advertisement

A comparison of two pre-operative frailty measures in older surgical cancer patients

Published:November 14, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2011.09.002

      Abstract

      Background

      Measuring frailty in older adults with cancer may identify patients with an increased risk of treatment complications. As it remains controversial how to identify frailty, the aim of this study was to compare a pre-operative multi-domain frailty measure based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to a modified version of the physical phenotype of frailty (PF) in a cohort of older adults with colorectal cancer, and to analyze the ability of the two classifications to predict post-operative complications and survival.

      Methods

      A prospective longitudinal study including 176 patients aged 70–94 years electively operated for colorectal cancer in three Norwegian hospitals. A pre-operative CGA, self-reported quality of life, and measurements of grip strength and gait speed were performed. CGA-frailty was defined as fulfilling one or more of the following criteria: dependency in activities of daily living, severe comorbidity, cognitive dysfunction, depression, malnutrition, or >seven daily medications. PF was defined with three or more of the following criteria: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, impaired grip strength, or slow gait speed. Outcome measures were post-operative complications and survival.

      Results

      The agreement between the classifications was poor. CGA-frailty was identified in 75 (43%) patients, while PF was identified in 22 (13%) patients. Only CGA-frailty predicted post-operative complications [P=0.001]. Both measures predicted survival.

      Conclusions

      A multi-domain frailty measure based on a CGA was more useful than frailty identified from a modified version of the PF criteria in predicting post-operative complications. For overall survival, both frailty measures were predictive.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin F.C.
        • Brighton P.
        Frailty: different tools for different purposes?.
        Age Ageing. 2008; 37: 129-131
        • Abellan van Kan G.
        • Rolland Y.
        • Bergman H.
        • Morley J.E.
        • Kritchevsky S.B.
        • Vellas B.
        The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice.
        J Nutr Health Aging. 2008; 12: 29-37
        • Ferrucci L.
        • Guralnik J.M.
        • Cavazzini C.
        • Bandinelli S.
        • Lauretani F.
        • Bartali B.
        • et al.
        The frailty syndrome: a critical issue in geriatric oncology.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003; 46: 127-137
        • Malani P.N.
        Functional status assessment in the preoperative evaluation of older adults.
        JAMA. 2009; 302: 1582-1583
        • Walter L.C.
        • Covinsky K.E.
        Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 2750-2756
        • Arking R.
        The biology of aging: observations and principles. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York2006: 63-67
        • Lim S.T.
        • Hee S.W.
        • Quek R.
        • Tao M.
        Performance status is the single most important prognostic factor in lymphoma patients aged greater than 75 overriding other prognostic factors such as histology.
        Leuk Lymphoma. 2008; 49: 149-151
        • Winograd C.H.
        • Gerety M.B.
        • Chung M.
        • Goldstein M.K.
        • Dominguez Jr., F.
        • Vallone R.
        Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39: 778-784
        • Balducci L.
        • Extermann M.
        Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach.
        Oncologist. 2000; 5: 224-237
        • Rockwood K.
        • Mitnitski A.
        Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62: 722-727
        • Jones D.M.
        • Song X.
        • Rockwood K.
        Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52: 1929-1933
        • Kristjansson S.R.
        • Nesbakken A.
        • Jordhoy M.S.
        • Skovlund E.
        • Audisio R.A.
        • Johannessen H.O.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010; 76: 208-217
        • Fried L.P.
        • Tangen C.M.
        • Walston J.
        • Newman A.B.
        • Hirsch C.
        • Gottdiener J.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56: M146-M156
        • Ensrud K.E.
        • Ewing S.K.
        • Taylor B.C.
        • Fink H.A.
        • Stone K.L.
        • Cauley J.A.
        • et al.
        Frailty and risk of falls, fracture, and mortality in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62: 744-751
        • Makary M.A.
        • Segev D.L.
        • Pronovost P.J.
        • Syin D.
        • Bandeen-Roche K.
        • Patel P.
        • et al.
        Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 901-908
        • Mahoney F.I.
        • Barthel D.W.
        Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.
        Md State Med J. 1965; 14: 61-65
        • Lincoln N.B.
        • Gladman J.R.
        The extended activities of daily living scale: a further validation.
        Disabil Rehabil. 1992; 14: 41-43
        • Miller M.D.
        • Paradis C.F.
        • Houck P.R.
        • Mazumdar S.
        • Stack J.A.
        • Rifai A.H.
        • et al.
        Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale.
        Psychiatry Res. 1992; 41: 237-248
        • Salvi F.
        • Miller M.D.
        • Grilli A.
        • Giorgi R.
        • Towers A.L.
        • Morichi V.
        • et al.
        A manual of guidelines to score the modified cumulative illness rating scale and its validation in acute hospitalized elderly patients.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56: 1926-1931
        • Folstein M.F.
        • Folstein S.E.
        • McHugh P.R.
        “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.
        J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-198
        • Yesavage J.A.
        • Brink T.L.
        • Rose T.L.
        • Lum O.
        • Huang V.
        • Adey M.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.
        J Psychiatr Res. 1982; 17: 37-49
        • Guigoz Y.
        The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature — what does it tell us?.
        J Nutr Health Aging. 2006; 10: 466-485
        • Balducci L.
        • Extermann M.
        Management of the frail person with advanced cancer.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2000; 33: 143-148
        • Aaronson N.K.
        • Ahmedzai S.
        • Bergman B.
        • Bullinger M.
        • Cull A.
        • Duez N.J.
        • et al.
        The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 365-376
        • Rockwood K.
        • Andrew M.
        • Mitnitski A.
        A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62: 738-743
        • Clavien P.A.
        • Sanabria J.R.
        • Strasberg S.M.
        Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.
        Surgery. 1992; 111: 518-526
        • Ouellette J.R.
        • Small D.G.
        • Termuhlen P.M.
        Evaluation of Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index as predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal carcinoma.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec; 8: 1061-1067
        • Riffat F.
        • Chu F.
        • Morris D.L.
        Liver resection in octogenarians.
        HPB (Oxford). 2006; 8: 206-210
        • Kristjansson S.R.
        • Jordhøy M.S.
        • Nesbakken A.
        • Skovlund E.
        • Bakka A.
        • Johannessen H.
        • et al.
        Which elements of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) predict post-operative complications and early mortality after colorectal cancer surgery?.
        J Geriatr Oncol. 2010; 1: 57-65
        • Cigolle C.T.
        • Ofstedal M.B.
        • Tian Z.
        • Blaum C.S.
        Comparing models of frailty: the Health and Retirement Study.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57: 830-839
        • Ronning B.
        • Wyller T.B.
        • Seljeflot I.
        • Jordhoy M.S.
        • Skovlund E.
        • Nesbakken A.
        • et al.
        Frailty measures, inflammatory biomarkers and post-operative complications in older surgical patients.
        Age Ageing. 2010; 39: 758-761
        • Janssen-Heijnen M.L.
        • Houterman S.
        • Lemmens V.E.
        • Louwman M.W.
        • Maas H.A.
        • Coebergh J.W.
        Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approach.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005; 55: 231-240
        • Lawrence V.A.
        • Hazuda H.P.
        • Cornell J.E.
        • Pederson T.
        • Bradshaw P.T.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • et al.
        Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199: 762-772
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • DePalma R.G.
        • Mosca C.
        • Healey N.A.
        • Kumbhani D.J.
        Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 326-341
        • Tan K.Y.
        • Chen C.M.
        • Ng C.
        • Tan S.M.
        • Tay K.H.
        Which octogenarians do poorly after major open abdominal surgery in our Asian population?.
        World J Surg. 2006; 30: 547-552
        • Bandeen-Roche K.
        • Xue Q.L.
        • Ferrucci L.
        • Walston J.
        • Guralnik J.M.
        • Chaves P.
        • et al.
        Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women's health and aging studies.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006; 61: 262-266
        • Ble A.
        • Cherubini A.
        • Volpato S.
        • Bartali B.
        • Walston J.D.
        • Windham B.G.
        • et al.
        Lower plasma vitamin E levels are associated with the frailty syndrome: the InCHIANTI study.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006; 61: 278-283
        • Cawthon P.M.
        • Marshall L.M.
        • Michael Y.
        • Dam T.T.
        • Ensrud K.E.
        • Barrett-Connor E.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older men: prevalence, progression, and relationship with mortality.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55: 1216-1223
        • Santos-Eggimann B.
        • Cuenoud P.
        • Spagnoli J.
        • Junod J.
        Prevalence of frailty in middle-aged and older community-dwelling Europeans living in 10 countries.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009; 64: 675-681